Difference Between Collaboration and Compromise

Key Difference – Collaboration vs  Compromise
 

When speaking of teamwork, collaboration and compromise are two strategies used in problem-solving. But there is a key difference between these two strategies. Collaboration refers to working together on an activity. On the other hand, a compromise refers to an agreement reached by each side making concessions. It is true that both collaboration and compromise involve two or more parties, but the manner in which the parties approach and solve the problem is different. Hence, one could highlight that the key difference between collaboration and compromise is that while in a compromise the parties involved have to come to a middle ground, in collaboration, this is not required. This article attempts to clarify the difference between collaboration and compromise with examples.

What is Collaboration?

First, let us begin with the term collaboration. Collaboration refers to working together on an activity. When faced with a particular problem, the individuals or groups approach the problem with an open mind. This allows them to keep away their own preconceived ideas and work as a group to find the best solution to the problem. It is true that all members of a group do not have the same ways of thinking. But this works as an advantage because every individual gets an opportunity to contribute by voicing his or her perspective. A solution can be arrived, once all the options have been explored.

The specialty of a collaborative task is that it creates a positive environment for all parties involved because everyone gets the opportunity to contribute. It also strengthens the bond among group members as they explore various possibilities together as a team.

Difference Between Collaboration and Compromise

What is Compromise?

A compromise refers to an agreement reached by each side making concessions. Unlike collaboration, a compromise can sometimes lead to tense situations among group members as some feel that their ideas are ignored or devalued. In a compromise, the parties involved approach the problem with their perspectives. This creates a situation where one feels that his solution is better than the another’s solution. Simultaneously, the members notice certain positive aspects of the solutions presented by others as well as negative aspects.

A compromise is when the members come to a middle ground where they form a solution that is most likely to make the majority satisfied. The negative aspect of a compromise is that the process of negotiation usually results in disappointment in group members.

Key Difference - Collaboration vs Compromise

What is the difference between Collaboration and Compromise?

Definitions of Collaboration and Compromise:

Collaboration: Collaboration refers to working together on an activity.

Compromise: A compromise refers to an agreement reached by each side making concessions.

Characteristics of Collaboration and Compromise:

Parties:

Collaboration: Two or more parties are involved.

Compromise: Two or more parties are involved.

Perspective:

Collaboration: Individuals present their perspectives from which the best is adopted to solve the problem.

Compromise: A middle ground has to be reached from the perspectives presented by the parties involved as a solution to the problem.

Atmosphere:

Collaboration: A positive atmosphere is created as each individual contributes towards problem-solving.

Compromise: A negative atmosphere can be created as some individuals feel that their ideas are not valued.

 

Image Courtesy:

1. Collaboration (9601759166) By Oregon Department of Transportation (Collaboration Uploaded by AlbertHerring) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

2. Compromise With the South (1864), by Thomas Nast By Thomas Nast [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons