Modern Liberalism vs Classical Liberalism
When someone is described as being liberal, you visualize him as a progressive, kind, supporter of equality, and a modern attitude. Well, this is how regimes or governments of democratic countries perceived as they are opposed to regimes with dictators, and are also different from communist governments. However, this is rather simplistic explanation of the word liberalism, and things become very confusing when we talk about modern liberalism and classical liberalism. It was just liberalism until the arrival of the term social liberalism or modern liberalism. The liberalism in the 19th century was referred to as classical liberalism. Let us see what the real differences between classical liberalism and modern liberalism are.
Though it was propounded even earlier in 18th century, classical liberalism was rather redefined in the 19th century in Europe in the wake of the industrial revolution and urbanization. It emphasized or harped upon limited role of the government, rule of law, freedoms of speech and religion, and importantly, free markets. The personalities that contributed to the body of classical liberalism included economist Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo. The proponents of classical liberalism favored very little role of the government with more and more individual freedom. Theorists made assumptions about human behavior, which are as follows.
• Actions of individuals were motivated by their pain and pleasure as they were egoistic in nature.
• People are calculating as they make decisions to maximize pleasure and minimize pain.
• People remain inert if there is no chance to increase pleasure or to reduce pain
• So fear of hunger or chances of a great reward were the only motivation for labor.
• Society was described as atomistic meaning it was no more than the sum of individual members.
As 19th century drew to a close, people were fed up with growing unemployment and lowering economic growth that led to disenchantment with classical liberalism. The deprivation and destitution of the working classes and the struggle of organized labor for a more dignified life, at par with those for whom they worked for, presented conditions that were ripe for a new school of thought later referred to as social liberalism. The romanticism of self-made men who worked hard to rise in stature in the society faded, and such instances became a thing of the past. Modern or social liberalism favored intervention by the government into economy. Modern liberalism not just favored the working classes; it also led to social activism in all walks of life. Modern liberalism emphasizes on labor laws, minimum safety standards in the industry, and minimum wages.
Summary
Changing circumstances and awakening of the poor and the oppressed led to changes in liberalism also.
From laissez-faire government to a government playing an active role for the welfare of the poor, there are many changes in the thinking of the liberals, which are reflected in modern liberalism or social liberalism. Gone are the ideals of self made men, as growing unemployment and destitution of the working classes make people realize that romantic ideas of working hard and making a place for oneself in high society is well nigh impossible.
While classical liberalism viewed government power as a necessary evil, modern liberalism recommends a far greater role of the government.
Related posts:
