Compare the Difference Between Similar Terms

Difference Between

Home / Science & Nature / Science / Chemistry / Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory     

Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory     

October 19, 2016 Posted by Abey S.D.

Key Difference – Crystal Field Theory vs Ligand Field Theory
 

Crystal field theory and ligand field theory are two theories in inorganic chemistry that are used to describe the bonding patterns in transition metal complexes. Crystal field theory (CFT) considers the effect of a perturbation of electron containing d-orbitals and their interaction with the metal cation and, in CFT, the metal-ligand interaction is considered as electrostatic only. Ligand Field Theory (LFT) considers the metal-ligand interaction as a covalent bonding interaction and depends on the orientation and the overlap between the d-orbitals on the metals and the ligand. This is the key difference between crystal field theory and Ligand field theory.

What is Crystal Field Theory?

Crystal Field Theory (CFT) was proposed by the physicist Hans Bethe in 1929, and then some alterations were proposed by J. H. Van Vleck in 1935. This theory describes some important properties of transition metal complexes such as magnetism, absorption spectra, oxidation states, and coordination. CFT basically considers the interaction of d-orbitals of a central atom with ligands and these ligands are considered as point charges. In addition, the attraction between the central metal and ligands in a transition metal complex is considered as purely electrostatic.

Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

Octahedral crystal field stabilization energy

What is Ligand Field Theory?

Ligand field theory provides a more detailed description of bonding in coordination compounds. This considers the bonding between the metal and the ligand according to the concepts in the coordination chemistry. This bond is considered as a coordinated covalent bond or a dative covalent bond to show that both electrons in the bond have come from the ligand. The basic principles of the crystal field theory are closely similar to those in the molecular orbital theory.

Key Difference - Crystal Field Theory vs Ligand Field Theory

Ligand-Field scheme summarizing σ-bonding in the octahedral complex [Ti(H2O)6]3+.

What is the difference between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory?

Basic Concepts:

Crystal Field Theory: According to this theory, the interaction between a transition metal and ligands is due to the attraction between the negative charge on the non-bonding electrons of the ligand and the positively charged metal cation. In other words, the interaction between the metal and the ligands are purely electrostatic.

Ligand Field Theory:

  • One or more orbitals on the ligand overlap with one or more atomic orbitals on the metal.
  • If the orbitals of the metal and ligand have similar energies and compatible symmetries, a net interaction exists.
  • The net interaction results in a new set of orbitals, one bonding and the other anti-bonding in nature. (An * indicates an orbital is anti-bonding.)
  • When there is no net interaction; the original atomic and molecular orbitals are not affected, and they are nonbonding in nature as regards the metal-ligand interaction.
  • Bonding and anti-bonding orbitals have sigma (σ) or pi (π) character, depending on the orientation of the metal and the ligand.

Limitations:

Crystal Field Theory: Crystal field theory has several limitations. It takes into account only the d-orbitals of the central atom; the s and p orbitals are not considered.  In addition, this theory fails to explain the reasons for large splitting and the small splitting of some ligands.

Ligand Field Theory: Ligand field theory does not have such limitations as in the crystal field theory. It can be considered as the extended version of the crystal field theory.

Applications:

Crystal Field Theory: Crystal Field Theory provides valuable insights into the electronic structure of transition metals in crystal lattices,

Crystal field theory explains the breaking of orbital degeneracy in transition metal complexes due to the presence of ligands. It also describes the strength of the metal-ligand bonds. The energy of the system is altered based on the strength of the metal-ligand bonds, which may lead to a change in magnetic properties as well as color.

Ligand Field Theory: This theory is concerned with the origins and consequences of metal– ligand interactions to elucidate the magnetic, optical, and chemical properties of these compounds.

References:
“An Introduction to Ligand and Crystal Field Theory” – EveryScience 
“Crystal Field Theory” Virtual Amrita Laboratories Universalizing Education.
“Ligand field theory” – Wikipedia
“Ligand field theory” – Encyclopedia Britannica 
“The Spectrochemical Series” – University of the West Indies – Department of Chemistry
“Ligand field theory” – Brian. N. Figgis – National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA
 
Image Courtesy:
“Crystal Field Splitting 4” By YanA at the English language Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0) via Commons Wikimedia
“LFTi(III)” By Smokefoot at English Wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by Sentausa (Public Domain) via Commons Wikimedia

Related posts:

Difference Between Aromatic and AliphaticDifference Between Aromatic and Aliphatic Difference Between Pauli Exclusion Principle and Hund Rule Difference Between Thermoplastic and ThermosetDifference Between Thermoplastic and Thermoset Difference Between Glycosidic Bond and Peptide BondDifference Between Glycosidic Bond and Peptide Bond Difference Between Acrylamide and BisacrylamideDifference Between Acrylamide and Bisacrylamide

Filed Under: Chemistry Tagged With: Compare Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory, Crystal Field Theory, Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory Differences, Crystal Field Theory Applications, Crystal Field Theory Definition, Crystal Field Theory Features, Crystal Field Theory Limitations, Crystal Field Theory vs Ligand Field Theory, Ligand Field Theory, Ligand Field Theory Applications, Ligand Field Theory Definition, Ligand Field Theory Features, Ligand Field Theory Limitations

About the Author: Abey S.D.

Comments

  1. J Hiller says

    May 20, 2020 at 3:45 pm

    Great article, thank you so much!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Request Article

Featured Posts

Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms

Difference Between Coronavirus and Cold Symptoms

Difference Between Coronavirus and SARS

Difference Between Coronavirus and SARS

Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza

Difference Between Coronavirus and Influenza

Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19

Difference Between Coronavirus and Covid 19

You May Like

Difference Between Soul and Spirit

Difference Between Soul and Spirit

Difference Between Android 2.2 (Froyo) and Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)

Difference Between Netbook and Laptop

Difference Between Telolecithal and Centrolecithal Egg

Difference Between Telolecithal and Centrolecithal Egg

Difference Between Refurbished and New

Latest Posts

  • Difference Between Rotational and Vibrational Spectroscopy
  • Difference Between Physical and Chemical Cross Linking
  • Difference Between Gauge Boson and Higgs Boson
  • Difference Between Fixed Point and Equilibrium Point
  • Difference Between Serine and Tyrosine Recombinase
  • Difference Between Suspending Agent and Emulsifying Agent
  • Home
  • Vacancies
  • About
  • Request Article
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2010-2018 Difference Between. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy: Legal.