Flicker vs Picasa web
Flicker and Picasa web are two photo sharing websites. Whether you are a photography enthusiast wanting to share your photos with the world or a professional photographer, chances are that you are aware of both Picasa web and Flicker which are the most popular photo sharing sites on the web today. Even common people who wish to share photos with friends use these services. One can upload his photos, create albums and even comment on other’s photos on the online storage sites. Though both serve the same purpose, there are many differences between the two which are as follows.
While Picasa web is online photo storage and editor site, Flicker is owned by Yahoo. While both offer both free and paid accounts, the storage capacities restricted by both are different on free accounts. While users can have unlimited storage capacity on Flicker, it displays only the last 200 photos uploaded by the user. Picasa limits storage capacity to 1GB. Picasa charges $5 per year for additional 20GB of storage space while flicker users have to pay $24.95 per tear for a pro account.
You can upload photos in all formats such as JPEG, PNG or GIF but Flicker converts them to JPEG before storing them. It also allows for tagging of people in photos. Picasa also does the same before organizing them into albums. Users can share their photos via emails and choose to remain public or hidden depending upon their preference.
With Flicker, the user has the ability to see a slideshow of his photos to choose and paste on blogs. On Picasa, you can see a slideshow but not embed externally.
One big advantage that Picasa offers is the ability to download all photos with a single click of mouse which is not there in Flicker. Video up loading is possible in Flicker.
Summary
Both Flicker and Picasa are online storage sites.
While Flicker is owned by Yahoo, Google owns Picasa.
Photo editing possible in Flicker and it also allows for video hosting.