• A A

Home > People > Religion > Catholic Bible and King James Bible Compared

Difference Between Catholic Bible and King James Bible

Catholic Bible vs King James Bible

The Holy Word every Christian should know about is found in the Bible. Because of this, every individual who follows the Christian faith should have access to the Bible. This is not hard since there are a lot of bibles that are easily accessible for everybody today. However, the large number of variations of the Bible makes it quite confusing for most people as to which one to choose and read. Two of the most popular ones are the Catholic Bible and the King James Bible.

The Catholic Bible stands out in the crowd of the Holy Scriptures variations because it is the only one that has added books from the Old Testament. These books are not found in other translations of the Bible.

In the Catholic Bible, one can find the books called Apocrypha, also referred to as the Deutercanonicals, which include Tobit, Maccabees I and II as well as Judith among others. Although the Jews did not preserve these books, the Christians did as they recognize the books’ spiritual value. While the Jews and the Protestants do not consider the books as a part of the Holy Scripture, the Catholics value them as such and, in the 16th century, have made the books an official part of the Scripture at the Council of Trent.

Even Jerome and Augustine, two of the most popular Catholic writers before the fall of the Roman Empire, debated over the value of the Apocrypha. Augustine believed in the spiritual value of the books while Jerome did not. Jerome did much of the translation of the Old and New Testaments from Greek and Hebrew into Latin. His side was favored at that time.

The Authorized King James Version, on the other hand, is the Christian Bible translation penned by the Church of England done in 1611. This is the third official English translation of the Bible and was conceived due to issues against the two earlier translations. King James I of England summoned the Hampton Court Conference to create this version of the Bible.

At first, the King James Version included all of the books from the Old and New Testament as well as the Apocrypha. Over time, however, the books of Apocrypha were eliminated from the King James Bible. The most modern King James Version does not have the Apocrypha in it.

The biggest difference between Catholic Bible and King James Bible lies largely on the printed words themselves. The King James Version has been known for centuries all throughout the world as the one that makes use of what is considered as the Old English language. In this Bible, there is also the obvious distinction between the second person singular and the second person plural. Knowing the difference between thou and you as well as thou and thee is important when using this version of the Holy Scripture. This makes it hard for someone who has been brought up for it to understand the King James Bible.

Knowing about what the two versions of the Holy Scripture have to offer is a great help in determining which one to get a hold of. It also helps to ask other people who share one’s faith and beliefs in choosing the one among the different variations of the Bible.


email

Related posts:

  1. Difference Between Catholic Bible and Baptist Bible
  2. Difference Between Bible and Quran
  3. Difference Between Catholic and Roman Catholic
  4. Difference Between California King and King
  5. Difference between Queen Bed and King Bed

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • Ellensewall

    As any examination of history will show very clearly, the deuterocanonical books were part of the Greek Septuagint version of the Hebrew Scriptures at the time of Jesus, which was considered by the ancient world a superb translation from the original Hebrew. From the beginning, the Septuagint was the version of the Hebrew Scriptures used by the Church in the Greek-speaking world, because it was the version used by Jews in the Greek speaking world. Fagments of several Deuterocanonical books in Hebrew and Aramaic were found in the Dead Sea Scrolls of Qumran. In AD 90-100 a Jewish council which rejected the Christian New Testament Scriptures declared that the Deuteroanonical books were not part of their canonical Scriptures. Among the things that weighed in favor of the Church embracing the Deuterocanonicals at the time that the canon of Scripture both Old and New Testaments was settled (Synod of Hippo, 393), is that the New Testament draws heavily from the Deuterocanonical books (see: http://www.scripturecatholic.com/deuterocanon.html). When Martin Luther split away from the Catholic Church, he not only questioned the Deuterocanonical books (on the basis of their having been defined by Jews in AD 100 as not part of their Scriptures), but at one point Luther even relegated the Epistle of St James, which disagreed with his “sola fide” theology, to “apocryphal” status (see James 2:18). Others in the Reformation movement put it back where it belonged! To sum up, the Deuterocanonicals are actually an integral part of the Christian Bible.

Copyright © 2010-2012 Difference Between. All rights reserved.Protected by Copyscape Web Plagiarism Detection
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy : Legal.
hit counters
eXTReMe Tracker
hit counters